INSIDE LINE

2011 Acura TSX Sport Wagon Full Test

Media Player

  • 2011 Acura TSX Sport Wagon Picture

    2011 Acura TSX Sport Wagon Picture

    There's a new wagon in town for 2011. An Acura wagon. | February 16, 2011

Road Test

2011 Acura TSX Sport Wagon Full Test

Isolated Middle Man or Perfect Middle Ground?

    64 Ratings

    That the 2011 Acura TSX wears the least-prominent beak in the Acura lineup is reason for rejoicing. That it's now available as a wagon with a practical, stylish, hatchback hind end is reason for straight-up celebration.

    After all, its TL and RL brethren, bigger cars with bigger price tags, succumbed to the Acura brand's now-iconic schnoz several years back, but the TSX — even through its transformation into a wagon — has remained remarkably beak-free.

    Right on.

    Wagon Logic
    Regardless of your position on Acura's brand-identifying proboscis, the TSX is, and has always been, a well-equipped sport sedan. And for 2011 Acura is offering a wagon version as an alternative for those who want the utility of a wagon without the burden of a taller SUV.

    Burden, you say? Yes. You see, we're car fans here. And short of a few stiffly sprung German exceptions, SUVs, even crossover SUVs, rarely handle as well as cars. And when they do, they really aren't all that fun to drive. We'll forgo the Newtonian physics needed to explain this phenomenon. Trust us here. SUVs aren't cars. And some people want cars with utility. Us included.

    This combination, unfortunately, isn't always well received by American buyers. Lexus tried it back in 2002 with the IS 300 SportCross. It was cool, utilitarian and even looked pretty good. But Americans, firmly entrenched in SUV mania, refused to shell out for a wagon.

    Acura doesn't seem to care, instead it is pressing on with blatant disregard for history and a solid commitment to people who prefer cars. Nice.

    The Performance Cost/Benefit
    But it's not 2002 anymore. Gas costs about a buck per gallon more than it did then, plus fuel economy in this SUV alternative should be better. And in the most painfully apparent observation in this story — it is. The EPA rates the TSX Wagon at 22 city/30 highway/25 combined — we recorded 24.3 mpg over 987 miles in our test car.

    Infiniti's EX35 — a crossover that lands roughly in the TSX Wagon's price range — is rated at 17 city/ 24 highway and 19 combined mpg. We recorded an average fuel economy of only 17 mpg in our last test of the EX35.

    Even at high rpm the i-VTEC four sings a refined song.

    Certainly, the Acura's better fuel consumption comes with a penalty — namely that it's considerably slower than the V6-powered EX35. Our test car, with its 201-horsepower 2.4-liter inline four-cylinder and five-speed automatic transmission (the only powertrain available in the wagon) hit 60 mph in 8.8 seconds (8.4 seconds with 1 foot of rollout like on a drag strip).

    The quarter-mile, too, requires more time in the TSX. Its 16.5-second pass at 84.9 mph is slower than every luxury crossover SUV made today. The power deficit is most obvious during throttle-position changes, which catch the engine outside its power band. Subtle moves accomplish nothing. Be subtle with the gas pedal and not much happens. You need to wood it to get any real reaction.

    Sport mode helps by holding onto gears longer, as does manual shifting via the steering-wheel-mounted paddles. An additional gear entirely would make an even bigger difference, but we don't expect to see a six-speed anytime soon.

    Braking distances are long for a car with a sport sedan legacy to uphold. At 127 feet from 60 mph, the TSX requires 6 more feet than the decidedly unsporty Toyota Venza. The 2011 BMW X3 requires only 116 feet.

    But Wait. It Handles, Right?
    Still, those seeking only utility and luxury might have less interest in its outright acceleration. Maybe you're after a carlike handling experience and simply don't need the speed.

    And the TSX, for the most part, delivers. It zipped through our 600-foot slalom at 64.6 mph and circled our 200-foot-diameter skid pad at 0.83g. These numbers are better than a Toyota Venza or Chevy Equinox, but not as good as the best-handling luxury crossovers.

    Still, we're not going to pretend the TSX Wagon is tuned as a driver's car. There's not as much feel or feedback through the electric-assisted steering as we'd like, and its chassis stops being enjoyable long before its limits are reached.

    There's adequate damping to keep the small wagon from wallowing over surface changes on the freeway, but not enough to offer genuine control on a less-than-perfect road. And for a car with some sporting intentions, the numbers — and the subjective experience — could be better. The upshot is that comfort is quite high and the ride frequency is tame on most any surface. This is a civilized wagon, not a sports car. It will serve you well as long as you're more inclined toward country cruises than you are to back-road thrashings.

    Will It Fit?
    When it comes to simple cargo volume, the TSX Wagon offers as much as most crossover SUVs. With 25.8 cubic feet of cargo space behind its rear seats and 60.5 cubic feet of space with them folded forward, it falls somewhere in the middle of the pack. The more expensive Audi Q5 offers 57.3 cubic feet with its seats down, while the Toyota Venza offers 70.1 cubic feet.

    The second-row seats don't fold completely flat, but Acura makes up for it with three bins (two small, one large) beneath the rear load floor. There's another bin built into the driver-side rear panel, which contains a 12-volt power point. There are also steel tie-downs in the cargo area to lock your heavy goodies to the floor — something conspicuously absent in many hatchbacks. Wagons equipped with the Tech package supply a power-operated hatch via a button on the driver door, a button on the hatch or from the key fob.

    There are no remote release handles for the second-row seats. Folding the seats is accomplished by reaching inside the hatch or going old-school through the back doors.

    The driver seat offers standard eight-way power adjustment and a manual lever on the side to manipulate lumbar support. Heated front seats are standard. Our 6-foot-1-inch copy editor stuffed himself in the backseat after adjusting the driver seat for his preferred position. His knees touched the seatback, but there was ample headroom. He'd tolerate a ride across town this way, but not much farther.

    Familiarity
    Otherwise, this is standard TSX fare. Leather covers the seating surfaces, steering wheel and shifter. There are steering wheel buttons for the audio and cruise controls, as well as for the standard Bluetooth phone connection. The center stack — all 40 buttons of it — is fairly busy, but we found it relatively easy to access critical functions. An auxiliary jack and a USB connection for your iPod are standard.

    There's a sense of quality inside the TSX that falls somewhere between the sensible Mazda CX-7 and the luxurious BMW X3. Everything fits together nicely, the materials are high quality and road and engine noise are kept largely at bay. Even at high rpm the i-VTEC four sings a refined song. Sure, you'll have to work to get it there, but it sounds pretty good when you arrive.

    Our test car, equipped with the Tech package (which includes navigation, a rearview camera, a 10-speaker premium audio system with a 15GB hard drive and the power liftgate), rang up a $35,470 total. That pricing positions the TSX Wagon at the bottom end of the luxury crossover spectrum and a few hundred dollars more than a similarly equipped Toyota Venza.

    And by our measure, that's exactly where it should be. It's not powerful enough to compete with more expensive luxury crossovers, yet it's more appealing on the inside than your average Equinox or Venza. Acura isn't expecting big sales numbers and neither are we. Still, we're glad to see it offer this wagon anyway, as it's only a little more power and a better transmission away from being truly desirable.

    The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.

    Sort By:

    capoany says:

    03:21 AM, 05/07/2011

    Finally saw one on the road. Very good looking car (I'm partial to wagons).  Needs two additional engine options- a turbo 4 and one of Honda's Euro-diesels. 'Hit it where they ain't', Acura.

    kc177 says:

    07:31 PM, 02/24/2011

    8.8 seconds? For a supposed luxury brand? Are you kidding? This thing would have a hard time getting out of the way of a Ford Explorer, Dodge Durango, or any GM/C SUV. All can be had for the same amount of money with much larger interiors and in case of the Ford easily comparable interior-wise to this station wagon.

    And this line:

    "Still, we're glad to see it offer this wagon anyway, as it's only a little more power and a better transmission away from being truly desirable."

    We raise holy hell for a 5-speed in a 2011 300 but offer this super rosey outlook on a LUXURY vehicle?

    stevesls6 says:

    09:13 AM, 02/23/2011

    I don't get why honda just doesn't retune the tubo motor in the RDX and get 300hp out of it and make a Type-S version of the TSX.

    kevm14 says:

    06:02 AM, 02/22/2011

    For 3 grand more you can get into a CTS Wagon, where the base engine is a 3.0 liter V6 of 270hp (at 7000rpm), on regular gas.  Oh, and it's right wheel drive, too.

    with says:

    08:14 AM, 02/21/2011

    @ smallfield

    Of course the TSX station wagon is meant for street drag racing, tackling the autocross course on the weekend, and extended weekend racing at the road course.  Just go read all the fanboys at sites like www.VTEC.yo sites.

    Why else would anyone consider a 3600 lbs station wagon.  Acura built this for racing!

    flatso says:

    07:12 AM, 02/20/2011

    Anyone that compares Acura to GM has clearly never driven both cars.  The TSX is an excellent value I just got a leftover TSX Tech for $28K and it is a superb car.

    contheon says:

    04:39 AM, 02/20/2011

    The price for this underpowered wagon and the bucktooth grille will insure low sales and failure in the marketplace.

    Acura has missed yet again.

    smallfield says:

    06:54 PM, 02/19/2011

    "People, get real: Why do we need a V6 on this thing? Are we gonna race it?"
    - I agree - tracking an Acura seems silly. So Honda puts one on the track in their ad?
    I have tracked both of my family's current daily drivers - neither is a Honda/Acura. Really if you are looking basic point A to B without a particular driving experience - there are cheaper cars with better milage.

    I agree with FSU - If they want it to compete as luxury sports sedan/wagon put a little boost to it. It'd improve the low end torque curve and make this a reasonable car to drive. A WRX is AWD (less efficient) and still gets 265hp with 19 city/25 hwy. A similar output would put this on par with current competition.

    I agree with the discussion people don't race Acuras, but part of luxury is having sufficent power to merge in traffic. Turning and stoping well when needed are expected in this segment.  

    Honda is the GM of the 80s and 90s - refusing to improve and progressing to obsolescence.

    zeph says:

    02:10 AM, 02/19/2011

    aestethically = aesthetically

    zeph says:

    02:09 AM, 02/19/2011

    This is a sensible alternative to Audi's A4 Avant. But to me it is ..errr...slightly aestethically challenged.

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Speed Read

    Vehicle Tested:

    2011 Acura TSX Sport Wagon With Technology Package

    Base Price:

    $34,610

    Price as Tested:

    $35,470 (includes destination)

    Engine:

    2.4-liter inline-4

    Gearbox:

    Five-speed automatic

    Power:

    201 hp @ 7,000 rpm

    0-60 mph:

    8.8 seconds

    Fuel Mileage:

    22 city/30 highway/25 combined

    What Works (pros):

    Wagon practicality, decent fuel efficiency.

    What Needs Work (cons):

    Could use more power, a six-speed transmission, or both.

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Year Make Model2011 Acura TSX Sport Wagon 4dr Wagon with Technology Package (2.4L 4cyl 5A)
    Vehicle TypeFWD 4dr 5-passenger station wagon
    Base MSRP$34,610
    Options on test vehicleVortex Blue Pearl
    As-tested MSRP$35,470
    Assembly locationSayama, Saitama Japan
    North American parts content (%)5
    Drivetrain
    ConfigurationTransverse, front-engine, front-wheel drive
    Engine typeInline-4
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)2,354/144
    Block/head materialAluminum/aluminum
    ValvetrainDOHC, four valves per cylinder, variable intake + exhaust-valve timing and lift
    Compression ratio (x:1)11.0
    Redline, indicated (rpm)7,000
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)201 @ 7,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)170 @ 4,300
    Fuel type91 premium unleaded (recommended)
    Transmission typeFive-speed automatic with console shifter and steering-mounted paddles with sport/competition modes
    Transmission ratios (x:1)I=2.652:1, II=1.164:1, III=1.082:1, IV=0.773:1, V=0.566:1
    Final-drive ratio (x:1)4.438
    Differential(s)Open
    Chassis
    Suspension, frontIndependent double wishbones with high-mount upper arm, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Suspension, rearIndependent multilink, coil springs, stabilizer bar
    Steering typeElectric speed-proportional power steering
    Steering ratio (x:1)13.5
    Turning circle (ft.)36.7
    Tire make and modelMichelin Pilot HX MXM4
    Tire typeAll-season front and rear
    Tire sizeP225/50R17 93V
    Wheel size17-by-7.5 inches front and rear
    Wheel materialAlloy
    Brakes, front11.8-inch one-piece ventilated cast-iron discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Brakes, rear11.1-inch one-piece solid cast-iron discs with single-piston sliding calipers
    Track Test Results
    Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.)3.4
    0-45 mph (sec.)5.7
    0-60 mph (sec.)8.8
    0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)8.4
    0-75 mph (sec.)13.0
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)16.5 @ 84.9
    0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.)3.4
    0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.)5.7
    0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.)8.8
    0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.)8.4
    0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.)13.0
    1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph)16.5 @ 84.9
    Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.)31
    60-0 mph (ft.)127
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)64.6
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON62.6
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)0.83
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON0.80
    Sound level @ idle (dB)48.4
    @ Full throttle (dB)73.2
    @ 70 mph cruise (dB)65.0
    Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm)2,400
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsLacks the power to spin its tires off the line so there's little a driver can do to improve times. Brake torque and manual shifting only slows times.
    Braking commentsLong distance for a car with some sporting intentions. Some pedal fade on fifth run.
    Handling commentsSkid pad: Remarkably good balance with ESC Off although limit is still low. Rotates well with lift throttle. Fun, even. ESC On significantly reins things in. Slalom: Again, ESC On keeps limits low/times slow. Turn it off, however, and this wagon gets exciting. Must keep throttle open to keep it straight.
    Testing Conditions
    Test date12/28/2010
    Test locationCalifornia Speedway
    Elevation (ft.)1,121
    Temperature (°F)60.1
    Relative humidity (%)35.2
    Barometric pressure (in. Hg)28.9
    Wind (mph, direction)0.38 mph tail/cross wind
    Odometer (mi.)1,008
    Fuel used for test91-octane gasoline
    As-tested tire pressures, f/r (psi)33/33
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)22 city/30 highway/25 combined
    Edmunds observed (mpg)24.3
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)18.5
    Driving range (mi.)555
    Audio and Advanced Technology
    Stereo descriptionAcura/ELS 460-watt Surround Sound system with 10 speakers and AM/FM/DVD-A, CD, DTS, Dolby Pro Logic II
    iPod/digital media compatibilityUSB and conventional aux jack
    Satellite radioStandard XM
    Hard-drive music storage capacity (Gb)Optional 15GB music storage capacity
    Bluetooth phone connectivityStandard
    Navigation systemOptional satellite navigation
    Smart entry/StartStandard doors
    Parking aidsOptional back-up camera
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3,599
    Curb weight, as tested (lbs.)3,594
    Weight distribution, as tested, f/r (%)57/43
    Length (in.)189.4
    Width (in.)72.4
    Height (in.)57.9
    Wheelbase (in.)106.5
    Track, front (in.)62.2
    Track, rear (in.)62.2
    Legroom, front (in.)42.4
    Legroom, rear (in.)34.3
    Headroom, front (in.)37.6
    Headroom, rear (in.)37.0
    Shoulder room, front (in.)57.8
    Shoulder room, rear (in.)56.1
    Seating capacity5
    Step-in height, measured (in.)14.1
    Trunk volume (cu-ft)25.8
    Max cargo volume behind 1st row (cu-ft)60.5
    Cargo loading height, measured (in.)23.6
    Tow capacity, mfr. claim (lbs.)Not published
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years/50,000 miles
    Powertrain6 years/70,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years/Unlimited miles
    Roadside assistance4 years/50,000 miles
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement