INSIDE LINE

Full Test: 2000 Acura Integra Type R

Road Test

Full Test: 2000 Acura Integra Type R

Past the "Best if Used By" Date, But Still (Quite) Good

    1 Rating
    A completely redesigned Integra is scheduled to arrive in 2002. Rumor has it that the new car will have more horsepower than the current car, but it will also move upscale in both image and price. Even the "Integra" name is supposed to be dropped and replaced with some sort of alpha-numeric code that will match Acura's other vehicle names like RL, TL, MDX and NSX. This poses an interesting question: What will happen to the Integra Type R?

    Available in limited production runs since 1997 (with the exception of 1999, when none were imported), the Type R is a high-performance version of the Integra GS-R. With special performance parts and factory-backed tuning, it is meant to be the supreme front-drive sport coupe. But just like the recent delayed introductions of the BMW M3 and the Audi S4, it is rare for an automaker to introduce a high-performance version of a new car until a couple of years have passed (doing so is a good way of maintaining public interest). Honda itself demonstrated this tactic by not offering a Civic Si version of the new 2001 Civic. Based on those assumptions, we're going to predict that a Type R version of the 2002 Integra won't show until perhaps 2003 or 2004.

    Since we had never evaluated an Integra Type R before, getting one for a full road test seemed prudent. We were also interested in seeing how well the overall Integra platform is holding up. After all, the current car was introduced in 1994 and is, frankly, getting a tad bit moldy. An entire generation of Honda Civics (the '96-'00 sixth-generation platform) has come and gone during the Integra's lifespan. In automotive terms, the Integra is the crotchety old man sitting on his porch, yelling at the young whippersnappers to get out of his yard, and recalling stories about the glory days to anybody who will listen.

    At least with the Type R modifications, the old man gets to hold a semi-automatic M-16. The 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine is equipped with variable valve timing (Honda's VTEC system) and produces 195 horsepower at 8,000 rpm and 130 foot-pounds of torque at 7,500 rpm. This is 55 more horsepower than the 1.8-liter engine used in the Integra LS and 25 more than the Integra GS-R. To achieve the extra power, Acura equips the Type R engine with a larger diameter exhaust system, a freer-flowing air intake, an extensively modified cylinder head with hand-polished intake and exhaust ports, and special pistons and connecting rods. An aluminum oil cooler is added to maximize heat dissipation and thermal efficiency.

    The Type R's extra power is routed through a special five-speed transmission with shorter gear ratios and a limited-slip differential. It arrives at unique 15-inch wheels shod with exclusive Bridgestone Potenza 195/55VR15 RE010 performance tires. The Type R's suspension is a four-wheel double-wishbone design like other Integras, but it does feature stiffer springs, shocks and bushings, as well as a larger diameter rear antiroll bar and additional body stiffening pieces. Both the front and rear brakes feature larger diameter rotors and bigger calipers. A refined ABS system is used, and it weighs 12.3 pounds lighter than the one used in the GS-R.

    Sounds pretty impressive, doesn't it? Yes, it does. But given a choice to either stay at home in a comfy chair reading the Type R's press kit or drive the Type R around in Los Angeles rush-hour traffic, most of our staff would choose the couch potato route. The engine's VTEC activation point happens at 5,700 rpm (versus the GS-R's 4,400 rpm), meaning that the tachometer's needle needs to be pointing north to achieve any serious forward thrust in city traffic. Keep the engine revs high, and people stare at you with faces that read, "What are you, a moron? You're gonna blow up your engine doin' that."

    The stiff suspension adds further damaging testimony to the Type R's lack of urban versatility. It makes little effort to soak up bumps, potholes and other pavement gremlins. In addition, Acura has removed all of the sound-deadening material (for reduced weight) from a car that wasn't very quiet to begin with. As such, this is a rather boisterous little car. On the freeway going 75 mph, the engine bleats out a monotonous "baaaaaaaaaaaaaa" as it spins at 4,100 rpm. There isn't even cruise control, a casualty of the weight loss program. If you like pain, take a Type R on a three-week highway tour of Nebraska, Oklahoma and Kansas searching for the world's biggest ear of corn.

    Based on these first impressions, it would be fairly easy to drive the Type R around town for a couple days, dismiss it as generally unpleasant, and be on your way. The Type R's unique rear wing, chin spoiler and wheels do little to improve the Integra's dated exterior looks. The rear wing is actually a constant annoyance because it bisects the driver's view out the rearview mirror. Inside, there's carbon fiber trim, sport seats, special floormats and a metal shift knob, but they can't hide the fact that the somber interior lacks flair (something that the Toyota Celica has) and smart design (something that the Ford Focus ZX3 has).

    But taken to deserted canyon roads and let loose, the Integra Type R's personality suddenly changes. Like a shy geek who unexpectedly opens up because he gets to talk about computers, all of the Type R's performance parts stand up and speak clearly about their real purpose. Strafing through corners, the suspension keeps the car's body motions completely under control. The effect of pavement undulations, road camber and weight transfer are communicated directly to the driver through the chassis. You can feel the suspension working, the wheels and tires moving up and down to maximize grip. This car rarely seems like it is front-drive, the limited-slip differential and spot-on suspension tuning working to provide neutral handling in almost all situations.

    Drive the Type R like you hate it. Rev the engine to the wee of its life. The exhaust note blooms with hard-edged fury that — like the S2000's sonorous wail — is about as close to a sport bike's as you'll find in a production car. The Type R wants you, no, practically begs you, to run up to the 8,400 rpm redline. Obey it, and the close-ratio gearing keeps the engine in VTEC mode and allows access to all 195 horses. Keep driving like a madman, working the shifter like the action on a rifle bolt, and the Type R gobbles up curvy pavement like The Flash late for a doctor's appointment. Remember those sport seats you didn't like in the city because they didn't adjust for height or tilt? Now they pay unexpected dividends, gripping your body and keeping you clamped down. The brakes bleed speed effortlessly and are easy to manipulate at the limit of traction. Only the steering lets the Type R down, its precision hampered by heaviness in the wheel and a lack of overall feel.

    Whereas other front-drive sport coupes seem peppy and sporty on the street but quickly become a wet noodle dynamically when they are pushed to their limits, the Type R is almost the opposite. It becomes better the harder you drive it. Proof comes from real racing. In SCCA Pro Racing's Speedvision World Challenge race series, race-modified Type R's have won the Touring Car championship every single year since the car's '97 debut. They dominated the 1998 and 1999 race seasons, taking the first, second and third slots in the final standings.

    Eventually, though, the curvy pavement ends, and it's back to the real world. This isn't to say that the Type R can't be used as a street machine. It certainly can, as all of the previous-year Type R owners can attest to. But the car that it's based off, the regular Integra, is simply getting old. The Celica GT-S and Prelude Type SH, in particular, make better all-around daily drivers that must do everything — not just chew bubblegum and occasionally play on two-lane blacktop.

    Consider this, though: Even after the debut of the Celica GT-S, the Mitsubishi Eclipse GT, the Mercury Cougar V6 and the GTI GLX, the Integra Type R is still the fastest and most capable front-drive sport coupe you can buy. That's something special, and we think it will continue to be something special 20 years from now. No matter what happens with the new Integra (or whatever Acura will call it), the '97-'01 Integra Type R will be a classic.

    Road Test

    Stereo Evaluation

    System Score: 5.5

    Components. The speakers in this system include a pair of 4-by-6 full-range drivers along the rear quarter panels. These are augmented by a pair of 6-inch mid-bass drivers in the front doors, mated to a set of 1-inch dome tweeters up above. The radio looks like "Civic on steroids." It offers a similar appearance and feel to a Civic faceplate, with a few fancy buttons to justify the bump in price. Feature-wise, the head unit offers AM/FM with a single-play CD and no cassette. As far as we can tell, a cassette is not even available as an option on this stereo, which in our opinion is a mistake. Hey, since this car drives like something from the '80s, shouldn't it have that decade's most popular audio format too? Although the radio has a nice bright LED readout, it should be a little larger, and besides, the radio is a little low in the dash, making it difficult to view and drive at the same time. To top it off, the buttons are small and bunched together.

    Performance. Part of the reason this stereo sounds so good is because the cabin is so small. In a larger car, it probably wouldn't sound nearly as good. Nevertheless, bass response is tight and accurate, with good attack in the upper-bass region. The mids are expressed with excellent detail and dispersion, while the tweeters tend to get "hissy" and hot at higher volume levels. Unfortunately, all the plastic parts in this car seem to want to sing in harmony -- the headliner rattles, the door panels buzz, and the car as a whole sounds like one of John Cage's lesser compositions. Lastly, the amp gets grainy and dirty anywhere above half-gain, causing the speakers to produce distorted sound. In spite of this, it's not a horrible sounding system. Like the rest of this car, it just seems unrefined and noisy, but youth is attracted to such things.

    Best Feature: Nicely positioned tweeters.

    Worst Feature: Sucky power amp runs out of juice above half gain. Yuck!

    Conclusion. This is a good sound system for callow youth, who prefer things with rough edges. For you more stately types, save your money and buy a Civic. — Scott Memmer

    Road Test

    Consumer Commentary

    [Here's the GS-R owner again, this time with observations about the difference in the suspension setups (he was following his brother, the Type R owner, during spirited driving on winding roads).]"[It would be really hard to] make a Type R out of a GS-R. Yes, you can make the GS-R faster if you supercharge it (1/4 mi. in around 14 sec) but in the handling department, you'd have to spend at least a couple of thousand dollars on the GS-R just to match the Type R. And let's not forget that the Type R has a limited-slip differential, which contributes (in addition to all the other stuff) to the fast slalom speed and track (lap) times. A decent LSD is worth about $800 without the labor [costs to install it]. Also, the brakes on the Type R are superior to the GS-R's. Figure in the cost for that too. I'd trade my sunroof and my cruise control in my GS-R in a second for a Type R. Those are the only 2 amenities the ITR lacks.

    Actually, the truth of the matter is that you don't have to go to the track to enjoy your Type R or take it near its limits. I was following my brother in his Type R one day in my GS-R. We were on a twisty back road and I decided to get up on his bumper and see if I can keep up with him. Well, all of a sudden he starts leaving me behind and going around those turns like he was on railroad tracks. My GS-R was squealing like a pig and the body roll was so bad that I lost him after the first curve. I was really trying to keep the GS-R in its lane and was near losing control many times and had to ease off a bit several times or I'd end up wrapped around a tree. When the road finally straightened out (only about 1/4-1/3mi. of twists), he was about 1/4 mi. down the road and waiting for me. The Prelude would have been humiliated almost as bad because I've driven Preludes and I've been able to keep up with 'Ludes many times in my GS-R or usually fall behind a few yards in the twisties. The ITR's handling is just superior and hair raising when you're in it with a capable driver going through country back roads.

    Having driven both a '98 Lude (& '97) and '98 ITR I can tell you that the ITR is not only faster but you feel that it is immediately. It's extremely quick and responsive steering will give you goose bumps and on 90 deg. turns you'll feel forces resembling that of a roller coaster. And last but not least, the sound of the engine alone would compel me to buy this car. But I'm avoiding Acura dealerships right now because of the dealer markups on top of MSRP. - only1harry, "Acura Integra Type R or Prelude Type SH," #44 of 90, March 1, 2000

    [2000 Type R owner] "I bought a 2000 Type R three weeks ago. Before buying I also drove the Prelude. The Prelude lists with more torque and provides exhilarating acceleration. However, it is heavier than the Type R, and gives less of a kick when it moves to the high rpm cams (at about 5,500 rpm). I disagree with comments above that it is better in comfort. I would say it is better in AMENITIES, but not comfort. The Type R, for example, has a more comfortable back seat. I actually took my two teenage kids on a 1 1/2 hour trip in the back. They didn't complain, believe it or not! The Type R feels lighter and more agile than the Prelude. Much more engine noise intrudes into the passenger compartment and the suspension is stiffer. When you hit 5,500 rpm in second, third, or fourth, it feels like you're going into hyperdrive. The car leaps forward and presses you back in the seat. It's almost as if the car takes over from the driver. The Prelude didn't quite give me that level of raw excitement. Another advantage is that the Type R gets better gas mileage than the Prelude (25/30 vs. 22/27). I use my Type R as a commuter car, driving 13 miles one way to work, with occasional trips to places like Chicago (100 mi.). I solved the performance tire problem by buying winter tires (Michelin Arctic Alpine) and rims from the Tire Rack (about $550 total). Handling suffers, but winter driving is far safer.

    Other drivers probably wonder how I get so much traction in a sports car. In terms of cost, my Type R cost me list price, which was just under $25,000. The Prelude SH lists for about $26,300, but the Honda dealer let me know they would deal on the car. I think they would have ended up pretty close in price. I figure with the limited production numbers for the Type R, my resale value will be higher than for the Prelude. Overall, since I wanted performance I know I made the right choice." - tlengyel, "Acura Integra Type R or Prelude Type SH," #11 of 90, Jan. 14, 2000

    [Owns a 1998 Type R] "The ITR in my opinion has no match in overall performance. The pre-2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse Turbo AWD is the closest when it comes to track/autocross racing. Also based on my experience, the 'Lude (SH or base) was always about 2 seconds off the ITR's time in the autocross events. We're talking about a one minute or less event here. Now, if you compare comfort/convenience, then yes, the ITR is at the bottom of the list!" - mrspeed, "Acura Integra Type R or Prelude Type SH," #56 of 90, March 8, 2000

    --Edited by Erin Riches

    Sort By:

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2000
    MakeAcura
    ModelIntegra
    Style2 Dr Type R Hatchback
    Base MSRP$24,350
    As-tested MSRP$24,920
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeFWD
    Engine type4 cylinder
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)1.8
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)195 @ 8,000
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)130 @ 7,300
    Transmission typeClose ratio 5-speed manual
    Track Test Results
    0-60 mph (sec.)6.7
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)15.2@92.9
    60-0 mph (ft.)113
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)62.4
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)34.8
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)25 City 30 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)20.8
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)13.2
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)2639
    Length (in.)172.4
    Width (in.)66.7
    Height (in.)51.9
    Wheelbase (in.)101.2
    Legroom, front (in.)42.7
    Legroom, rear (in.)28.1
    Headroom, front (in.)38.6
    Headroom, rear (in.)35
    Seating capacity4
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)13.3
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years / 50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years / 50,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years / miles
    Roadside assistance4 years / 50,000 miles
    Free scheduled maintenance2
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsNot Available
    Head airbagsNot Available
    Antilock brakesStandard
    Traction controlNot available
    Stability controlNot available
    NHTSA crash test, driverGood
    NHTSA crash test, passengerAverage
    NHTSA crash test, side frontNot tested
    NHTSA crash test, side rearNot tested
    NHTSA rollover resistanceNot tested
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement