INSIDE LINE

Full Test: 2001 Acura 3.2CL Type S

Road Test

Full Test: 2001 Acura 3.2CL Type S

A Coupe D'Etat? Not Quite.

    1 Rating
    Imagine your typical honors course in high school, full of the best and brightest, on the verge of ruling the world. You've got Barry BMW, brilliant and fabulously well read, but a bit of a punk sometimes and prone to wear expensive outfits. You've got Annie Audi, complex, chic and sharp as a whip, despite her lack of a decent caboose. And Martin Mercedes, who can get by on pure genealogy alone.

    Then there's good ol' Andy Acura. No, he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. But he always gets his homework in on time, is never tardy, and you know that if you ask him to take a note to the principal's office, he won't dawdle or take the long route. Nope, Mrs. Van Allan will have the note in her gnarled, liver-spotted hands just as soon as Andy's little legs can carry it to her.

    So what happens if you inject a bit of hip, a dash of verve and a pinch of attitude into Andy? Does he become an object of affection? Desire? Or is the result a classic interpretation of a hipster doofus?

    Acura is hoping that Andy, er, the new 3.2 CL Type S will be the kind of car that you dream about. Lust after. And all those other phrases that incorrectly end with a preposition.

    On paper, the Acura should excel. Amongst its formidable competition, it's got the most powerful engine. It's got the most standard features. It's got the lowest price tag. Yet it still lacks that certain magic glimmer that distinguishes the segment-leading 3 Series.

    Perhaps it's in its accessibility. The Type S is tailor-made to appeal to the mass-audience consumer who likes a luxury nameplate and the goodies that come with it, as well as the ability go fast, but doesn't want to expend that little bit of extra effort that yields ultimate driving pleasure.

    Let's start with the front-wheel-drive layout. Really, no true performance car can be termed thusly if power is delivered to the front paws rather than the hind legs. Yes, it'll handle better in the wet or snow, but on dry pavement, no front-wheel-drive car can whup one with a rear-wheel configuration when it comes to sheer driving dynamics. Accordingly, guiding the Acura felt a tad sludgy as compared to the keen polish of a BMW. However, as the CL is based on Honda's global midsize platform, and all Hondas are FWD save for the brilliant exception of the S2000, we can't expect that they'd eschew their proven formula to create a RWD performance vehicle. Can we?

    And, from our "Rockford Files" fan, a tongue-in-cheek comment from executive editor Karl Brauer - "The emergency brake is not operated by hand. You have to push a pedal on the far left side of the footwell. This is lame for a car that's supposed to compete with a 3 Series. With front-wheel drive, the only way to get the car sideways is to use the e-brake, but you can't do that with this setup." That Brauer - always up to his impish tricks. "Seriously, though," he contends, "no serious performance car that's deserving of the title lacks a hand-brake - it reduces its potential maneuverability."

    On to the tranny. The SportShift design on the Acura is like that of BMW's - that is, the manual shift gate is correctly located on the left side of the box, near the driver, and moves up for upshifts and down for downshifts. Very intuitive, very easy to use. However, like most automanual transmissions, the gearshifts weren't as crisp or quick as a true manual; there was little difference between leaving it in the automatic mode and rowing your own gears in the middle range. At highway speeds, however, the auto managed to get confused, becoming hesitant when going from 60 mph to 80; we really had to work for a downshift. Car manufacturers have yet to develop an automanual that works like a true manual tranny, and for a performance-oriented vehicle, we'd expect the option of a manual.

    Furthermore, steering could use a bit more feel. Although agile, quick and linear, the numb steering wheel transmitted little feedback from the road -- not the best trait in a performance vehicle.

    We've got these gripes against the CL. But what the Acura lacks in flash, it more than makes up for in solid, dependable, and at times, excellent performance and a more-than-generous list of feature content, helping to create bonafide value.

    Shod with 17-inch, machined finish alloys, the wheels of the CL Type S are awfully flashy, too much so, perhaps. It's like Andy wearing Gucci loafers when he'd look perfectly presentable in Florsheims. The awesome Michelin Pilot 215/50R17 V-Rated all season rubber stuck to the road like a limpet does sea-soaked rocks, didn't plow much in tight turns, and protested very little even when pushed hard.

    The ultra-refined motor is exemplary of Japan's best. The 3.2-liter VTEC V6 powerplant makes copious power; 260 horses, to be exact. That's 35 more than the new inline-six of the BMW 330i. In the upper reaches of the rev range, near 6,100 rpm when the peak power is reached, it emanated a wicked little growl. Up to that point, however, it was the model of finesse. Thanks to vacuum-controlled front and rear hydraulic mounts, it emitted little to no sound, rumble or vibration; nor did it bestow any excitement. Again, accessibility is key: Peak torque of 232 foot-pounds is delivered between 3,500-5,500 rpm where most drivers would most need it. Our road test editor was able to derive a 0 to 60 time of 6.7 seconds, slightly slower but comparable to the 330Ci's acceleration numbers. You will have little trouble keeping up with that Bimmer, but the driver of the BMW will be having more fun than you are, thanks to greater communication between man and machine.

    Braking performance from the four-wheel ABS system was excellent, requiring 131 feet for the 60 to 0 deceleration run, with smooth, predictable results every time. The ABS kicked in with a proper amount of pulse, and straight-line stability was near perfect and reassuringly consistent.

    The double wishbone front suspension and multilink rear suspension jostled the commuter while traversing broken pavement around city streets, unable to dampen many of the bumps, but did an admirable job of managing canyon roads around Malibu with a modicum of body roll. The CL easily maintained its equilibrium, while composing itself quickly before gobbling up the next curve. Improved torsional rigidity over the previous CL was evident here, and inspired both respect for Acura engineers and confidence in the driver to push the car.

    Not that we'd get into too much trouble. All CLs come standard with a traction control system (TCS), but the Type S is replete with Vehicle Stability Assist (VSA) that combines TCS and ABS to manipulate the throttle, fuel injection system and apply brake force to the right or left front wheel to better maintain control in an emergency maneuvering situation. Upon speedily entering a sharp corner and braking a hair too late for a turn, the VSA light on the dash blinked several times during our test driving, indicating that technology saved our collective butts. However, with VSA shut off, we took note of a light tail at the limit, resulting in a spin at the track.

    The safety of their consumers was at the forefront of Acura engineers' minds, as evidenced by the dual-threshold front airbags, standard side airbags, xenon headlamps to aid visibility, the aforementioned VSA, and the fact that the first 50 pages of the owner's manual is devoted to listing the safety features and giving you safe driving tips.

    Acura is so thoughtful. So considerate. The CL is stuffed with comfort and convenience features. In fact, the only option available on the CL is the excellent DVD-based navigation system. Operated from a well-placed "smudgeless" touch screen above the stereo (oh, by the way, the smudgeless screen is not so smudgeless when you've got a 7-year old with idle hands on board), most editors found the system simple to use, and all were impressed by its capacity - a map of the continental U.S. exists on a single disc, so you don't have to bother asking Toothless Jebediah the way to the nearest Olive Garden. Handy steering wheel controls can also be used to operate the nav system.

    When turned on but not programmed, the screen blanks to a canopy of stars. At night, you can pretend you're aboard the Battleship Galactica, spiraling into the vast beyond, but during the day it looks like dust particles have invaded your cabin. The screen is canted at a nice angle, and doesn't wash out in bright sunlight.

    The screen also inexplicably controls some of the air conditioning functions. But only some, like the fan speed and the vents from which the air is blown. Items like the temperature control and auto-climate control button are below the screen. It's not overly complicated, but what happens if you damage the touch screen? You'd have to rely on Auto mode to cool or heat your cabin.

    The stereo, at least, is a stand-alone unit. And what a cool stereo - few cars in this class can boast an in-dash Bose six-disc CD changer as standard equipment. Before you pshaw at this generosity, consider this fact: with a BMW you've gotta shell out $200 bucks to get a single CD player. Meanies, ain't they? The changer, and a knob-controlled radio tuner and adjustor, kept us humming. Outstanding reception ensured that we wouldn't miss a moment of "Hairspray Replay" 80s weekend, courtesy of the local station.

    Fit-and-finish of the cabin were up to Acura's exacting standards; none of our editors were able to find much to nitpick. Criticism was limited to the sterile look of the interior, and opinions were divided. While some preferred the warmth of the wood-grain trim and gathered leather insets on the door panels, others maintained that the bourgeois fake wood and dull-toned leather lacked the punch or drama of austere-yet-chic European competitors.

    The seats lent themselves to a high degree of comfort, including 8-way power adjustment memory (you can reset to your perfect position before entering the car by a mere click of the remote key fob), effective side bolstering, and a taut, perforated leather covering. Standard seat heaters warm your tush on chilly days. The dual-tier center console is spacious, and slides fore and aft on tracks to optimize comfort for drivers of all sizes; one driver noted that it also had the effect of sliding out of the way as to not rub her forearm while utilizing SportShift. Two power sockets, with one in the center console, provided enough outlets for all our electronic gewgaws.

    Everything has that gentle Acura touch to it, from the soft deployment of the cupholders to the easy-open sunglasses holder. Thoughtful to the extreme, Acura provided a sun visor extender and plenty of storage spaces, with coin boxes, sizable door bins and seatback pockets to hold doodads.

    Even rear seat passengers, who usually get gypped in a coupe, will ride in comfort - there was plenty of knee and toe room, although space between the head and roof was at a premium. The seats are nicely bolstered with adjustable headrests, and they also get a floor-mounted console that separates the two seats and flips up to reveal a good amount of space, as well as an armrest that folds down (revealing a ski pass-through) to a comfortable height to rest weary elbows.

    The 13.6-cubic-foot trunk is roomy, with a shopping bag hook, storage tray and a cargo net to please Hold Everything catalogue fanatics. But if Acura installed hydraulic struts for the hood, why couldn't they use some for the trunk? The luggage-crushing manual hinges are outdated and eat up storage space.

    Acura forewent an angular rear in favor of a more rotund derriere. Creases were reserved for the front - all the lines of the front fascia come together in a bird-beak point in the middle; aside from these styling modifications the CL looks little more distinguished than an Accord coupe that recently returned from a fancy Swiss boarding school.

    By now, you may have noticed the superfluousness of the word "standard" in this review. It's no mistake. The CL's numerous features, which may be ruinous for your bank account in a similarly equipped German car, come standard with the Acura. Yup, even with a base CL you get leather, heated seats, a six-disc CD changer, Homelink universal transmitter, power moonroof, xenon headlights with auto-off feature, traction control, four-wheel disc ABS, side airbags, and heated, electrochromic mirrors. The CL Type S adds SportShift, 17-inch wheels, VSA, sport-tuned suspension, and, of course, the 260-horsepower engine. It was almost beyond us how Acura was able to pack this many features into the CL without charging an exorbitant price.

    The riddle is partly solved by a cabin that gives intimations of luxury, but never quite fully immerses the driver in it. The leather, while acceptable and copious, lacked the suppleness of touch and luminosity of tone that marks the true luxury vehicle. Although there is an instrument panel brightness control, the cabin was too dark while driving at night for our tastes. For instance, neither the steering wheel-mounted radio controls nor the cruise control (the activator and the set buttons are, unfortunately, in two separate places) were lit; finding them after twilight is a haphazard exercise of fumbling around the wheel and dash while driving. Plasticky plood doesn't do much to enhance the cabin, at least for this writer who prefers monotone plastic to faux wood grain. Dual climate control is not an option.

    Ultimately, Acura can't match its primary performance-oriented entry-level luxury competitor, the BMW 3 Series, in terms of driving dynamics and handling. It earnestly reaches to be a star in both the luxury coupe as well as the sport coupe class. While it solidly places, it's not a stellar contender in either. But despite obvious cost cutting, it provides terrific value for the money. This Acura is for those who like to go fast comfortably but don't especially like to work at it. You get most of the performance available in its Teutonic counterpart, and for its surprisingly low price, you get all the features that you could ever wish for and, best of all, they come standard.

    No, the Acura CL Type S doesn't inspire much passion or excitement, but it does everything exceedingly well. If it were a student, it would pretty much garner a 3.8-average, but would lack the A-pluses and advanced-placement class credit that would bump it over and above the other excellent pupils in the honors courses. Students like Andy (or cars like the Acura CL Type S) make your life easier, ensure the rhythms of the day and assure you that all's right with the world. But it's the Barrys and Annies you really remember when flipping through the faded annals of yearbooks past.

    Road Test

    Road Test Summary

    • On paper, this Acura should excel. It's got the most powerful engine. It's got the most feature content. Yet it still lacks that certain magic glimmer that distinguishes European competitors.

    • The powerful motor on the Type S was satisfying, if a bit lacking in visceral appeal.

    • Numb steering feel, front-wheel-drive and an automatic transmission prevent the CL from attaining its status as a true performance-oriented car.

    • Its feature content makes up for most of its deficiencies. For the money, you get an incredible array of standard goodies.

    • If you like to go fast and like luxury features, but don't want to spend a lot or care deeply about performance, this is the car for you.

    Road Test

    Consumer Commentary

    "I bought the Type S within three days of seeing and driving it. This car provides the ultimate in luxury, comfort, and SPEED! This thing flat flies. I always preferred a five-speed BUT, this five-speed auto tranny in the CL-S is wonderful. I love the ability to shift without having to use a clutch. As far as FWD being a liability.... PLEASE! I don't see it that way. I know one thing...as soon as the road gets wet or slick I won't have to worry about the back end being all over the road! Read the available early reviews on this car! They're praiseworthy of the 'S'. Besides those BMWs are everywhere!" - okphillip, "Acura CL-S vs. BMW or Audi?? Which do you prefer??", #2 of 167, May 14, 2000

    "I agree that only the 323 is close to the Type S and Audi in price. The 328 is kind of out of thatrange. I only drove and bought the Type S. I have sat in the other cars. To me, the SIZE of theType S makes it a much greater value. Even though it's only a two-door, it has MUCH more room than the other cars' four-door versions. Styling, as always, is subjective. I love it. What others call bland, I call distinctive. It's definitely a subtle look, but really beautiful to me. And the way it drives... I can't begin to describe it. I went from a $25,000 Accord EX V6 (4 door) to the Type S.

    I am still stunned at how much better the Type S is for only $6,000 more. It's amazing. The Accord, as nice as it was, might as well be a Hyundai.... no joke. The Type S does absolutely everything MUCH, MUCH better than the Accord. And the most impressive thing to me so far... my first full tank of gas yielded 22.4 mpg in all city driving. Better than my Accord despite the CL's extra 60hp and 300lbs. Amazing." - hhh125, "Acura CL-S vs. BMW or Audi?? Which do you prefer??", #5 of 167, May 15, 2000.

    "I drove a BWW 328Ci (manual tranny) for almost two weeks (company leased), and was generally impressed with the car (I really beat on it). It handled well, had pretty good pick up, and tons of gadgets. I was seriously considering buying one. A friend of mine mentioned that he had heard of a new Acura, and that I should at least take a look. I went to my local Acura dealer and asked if I could drive a Type S. The fleet manager took me out for over an hour, and really let me put the car through its paces. The Acura CL Type S will kill the BMW (manual tranny still) in raw acceleration, at any speed. As far as overall handling, they are both comparable, but I still give the CL a slight edge due to the notably less body roll in the tight stuff. I spent many years off-road racing, and have had several advanced tactical driving courses. I know exactly what to look for. Many so called "driving enthusiasts" will insist on RWD; in the real world it doesn't make any difference. It's all about skill.... As far as luxury, the Acura has the same 'level' as the BMW, their gadgets (and etc) are nearly identical. Extremely plush interiors, superb craftsmanship, and excellent ergonomics. Assembly on both cars was top notch. The only reasons to buy the BMW (performance vs. performance) is if you have an extra $10g's to blow on the same amenities as the Acura, or you're a yuppie that just has to have that little $10,000 badge that says 'BMW'. There are people who will argue FWD vs. RWD, both have their advantages, but that is ultimately decided by driver skill, not where the power gets put down. As for style, that's totally subjective! To me, the BMW is a hot looking car, so is the CL-S (especially with the Acura factory wing). Personally, I like the 'cruise missile' look of the CL-S. Needless to say, I never looked back at BMW, and there's a Satin Silver Metallic 'Type S' (with wing) in my garage now." - griffster, "Acura CL-S vs. BMW or Audi?? Which do you prefer??", #66 of 167, June 26, 2000

    "I can see why some people will always opt for the Bavarian nameplate - I'm on no crusadehere. I do think perspective is important though. The numbers suggest, and my recent experience shows, that the CL-S is competitive even with the M3 (given driver error and some luck perhaps). Neither the 328 nor the 330 have any business in a head-to-head 0-60 or ¼-mile race with a 260-horsepower vehicle, manual or no. That's not to say that they aren't competitive or arguably better through curves or more fun thanks to RWD and the option of a manual. I'd suggest, though, that BMW owners generally, and particularly M3 owners, ought to be very thankful that Acura did not provide us with the option of a five-speed, or heaven forbid, a six-speed CL-S. Not only would it likely make for a sub 30K MSRP but would surely stand up to any and all Beemer comers. In any event I'll give BMW owners (non M-types) the benefit of the doubt and assume that they didn't pay $35K-40K for their car's straight-line performance. I'll also assume that they all sleep well having spent the extra dough for whatever reason they deemed fit (status, spartan German interior, brand loyalty, etc.). Perhaps, in return, you all will do us the favor of recognizing that not all drivers are preternaturally disposed to the BMW nameplate. We'll look around, consider price, performance, reliability and resale value and then make a purchase. In this case, having done the above I find it difficult to believe too many non-preternaturally disposed persons will end up in either a 328 or 330. If they do I'd like to guess it's because they're really happy about the fact that BMW specially engineered the door handle wells so that women with long fingernails would have easy access to the car (something I read somewhere on these boards). Alright, maybe I lied when I said I wasn't on a crusade." - platton, "Acura CL-S vs. BMW or Audi?? Which do you prefer??", #108 of 167, July 17, 2000

    "I have purchased a silver 2001 Acura CL-S recently. I was quite happy in the first threeweeks. However, I find numerous problem on the exterior of the car: (1) The passenger side door lock doesn't work all the time, so the passenger may not be able to open the door from the inside from time to time. However, opening the door from the outside work. (2) Around the rear panel above the rear bumper, there is a 1.5" x 0.5" scratch. It has some silver paint on it, so I assume that it has been touched up by the manufacturer but was done poorly. I didn't notice it unless I see it from certain angle through direct sunlight. When I run my finger around this area, I find the surface very irregular. (3) There is a small gap between the front grill and the bumper, about ~1.5". I didn't notice it until my neighbor put half of his hand in the gap and told me what a big gap it was. My car was produced on 03/2000, so I assume it [was among] the first couple cars get shipped from the factory. Now, my car has been in the dealership for more than five days, and they said they are going to change the lock, remount the bumper and repaint the rear panel. I am nervous because they may take my new car apart, and I don't know if they will be able to match the exact color to paint on the panel.... I am really disappointed by the quality control of Acura, and these flaws should have been found and fixed before they ship the car. Gee, I [paid] more than $30K for this car!! [Did] anyone else find problems in their new Acura CL (other than the famous sunroof flaw)?? Or am I just the only unlucky one?? Other than the exterior flaws, the engine is great, and the car is very, very fast!! I ... [find it difficult] to drive less than 50 mph... in the city. My car only [has] ~500 miles on it, but the gas mileage so far is not impressive - I can only take [it] up to 280 miles for the entire tank of gas - maybe my car hasn't [broken in] yet... I haven't driven the car on any freeway." - stanley_ho, "Acura 2001 CL -- Part 2," #42 of 1864, May 4, 2000

    -Edited by Erin Riches

    Sort By:

    Sort By:

    Close

    Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter Share on Twitter

    Advertisement

    Tags

    Specs & Performance

    Vehicle
    Model year2001
    MakeAcura
    ModelCL
    Style3.2 Type S 2dr Coupe (3.2L 6cyl 5A)
    Base MSRP$32,330
    As-tested MSRP$32,785
    Drivetrain
    Drive typeFWD
    Engine typeV6
    Displacement (cc/cu-in)3.2
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm)260
    Torque (lb-ft @ rpm)232
    Transmission type5-speed shiftable automatic
    Chassis
    Steering typespeed-proportional power steering
    Tire size, frontP205/60VR16
    Tire size, rearP205/60VR16
    Brakes, frontventilated front disc / solid rear disc
    Track Test Results
    0-60 mph (sec.)6.7
    1/4-mile (sec. @ mph)15.01@95.89
    60-0 mph (ft.)131.5
    Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph)63
    Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g)39.4
    Test Driver Ratings & Comments
    Acceleration commentsShifts from first to second resulted in chirping the tires, which it did consistently. Best times resulted from a street start without torque-braking the transmission, but manually shifting it.
    Braking commentsVery stable with no side to side movement. Straight and solid.
    Handling commentsThe vehicle is well-balanced and tossable. Traction control was noticeable at the limit, but not terribly intrusive.
    Testing Conditions
    Elevation (ft.)1,010
    Temperature (°F)79
    Wind (mph, direction)6
    Fuel Consumption
    EPA fuel economy (mpg)19 City 29 Highway
    Edmunds observed (mpg)19
    Fuel tank capacity (U.S. gal.)17.2
    Dimensions & Capacities
    Curb weight, mfr. claim (lbs.)3510
    Length (in.)192
    Width (in.)70.6
    Height (in.)55.5
    Wheelbase (in.)106.9
    Legroom, front (in.)42.4
    Legroom, rear (in.)33
    Headroom, front (in.)37.5
    Headroom, rear (in.)36.7
    Seating capacity4
    Cargo volume (cu-ft)13.6
    Warranty
    Bumper-to-bumper4 years / 50,000 miles
    Powertrain4 years / 50,000 miles
    Corrosion5 years / miles
    Roadside assistance4 years / 50,000 miles
    Free scheduled maintenance3
    Safety
    Front airbagsStandard
    Side airbagsStandard
    Head airbagsNot Available
    Antilock brakesStandard
    Traction controlStandard
    Stability controlStandard
    NHTSA crash test, driverN/A
    NHTSA crash test, passengerN/A
    NHTSA crash test, side frontN/A
    NHTSA crash test, side rearN/A
    NHTSA rollover resistanceN/A
    CollapseSpecs and Performance Expand Collapse

    Advertisement